On Apr 24, 2012, at 13:56 , andy pugh wrote: > On 24 April 2012 20:52, Sebastian Kuzminsky <[email protected]> wrote: > >> That file is in the master branch, and it looks like it was part of Jeff's >> pluggable interp changes way back when. Jeff, is that anything useful or >> should we just remove it? > > Isn't it what you get when a patch fails to "take"? If so then I would > have thought that they were always spurious.
A .rej file indicates that part of a patch didn't apply. It means your resulting tree doesn't have all the changes you expected, and you need to manually inspect the rej file to figure out how to apply that part of the patch. -- Sebastian Kuzminsky ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
