On 9/19/2012 3:22 PM, John Kasunich wrote: > Taking this crazy idea one step farther, what if this > daemon process was more of a "HAL server"? Instead of > every instance of halcmd directly accessing the lists > and other metadata, halcmd would simply ask the server > to do it. I don't know much about how client-server > stuff is implemented (RPCs?, sockets?) but if only > the server is accessing the metadata, then the HAL > mutex isn't needed, and the internals of HAL might not > need to be visible to so many individual programs. Oh my!
The American banjoist Roy Clark used to say during live performances that the music was so good it was making his nipples hard. He would pause and then say "I know it's wrong, but I'm weak." This may be such a moment:-) Regards, Kent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
