On Tue, Sep 25, 2012, at 01:43 PM, Michael Haberler wrote: > I am sorry to be teutonic as the crowd moves on to the next most > interesting feature discussion, like for instance pathnames. > > -------> below is a decision item for going forward <------------ > > > if we want to enable the 'userland metadata for HAL' idea for the future I > > think it is a prerequisite to redefine the above observation as a rule, > > which reads: > > > > ----> no hal_ functions in thread functions whatsoever, only in init/exit > > code. > > Are we ready to commit to this, yes or no?
Yes, IMHO > > And no, this will not resolve by hoping somehow programmers can work > without a plan, or decisions, and at the end a reasonable result > magically appears given a project codebase of this size. This is a > fundamental change in how things are approached, and it will impact many > other decisions. > > I have a bridge to sell to the folks who believe isolated divination is a > replacement for basic planning and coordination. > > Any board members around who feel it is part of their role to exert some > stewardship about long-term issues - please speak up. > > - Michael -- John Kasunich [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
