I'm just about to do some traveling and focus on work, so I figured I 
would post a couple of observations that I will not have time to 
properly document and/or test against the current git source.  Sorry 
about that, but if I put it off any longer it will be a month or more.  
Some of these issues may have been addressed already, but they are 
apparent in v2.5.0 as distributed on the Ubuntu distribution.


test axis pane in stepconf wizard:

There is a step/measurement scaling problem (looks to be exactly 2.0x) 
when testing the movement.  To replicate, set up the axis as you would 
expect for your configuration.  Have it run a test over some distance 
(say 1.0") while reading off on a dial indicator.  The actual travel is 
twice what I expected.  So, if I adjust to accommodate, save, and then 
open LCNC, the travel is actually half of what I expect.  Thinking on 
this a bit, it might not be a bug per se but a misunderstanding of the 
expected behavior (is it +/-X movement [ie twice that specified], or 
simply traveling the specified X distance in the 1 or + directions).  
The problem with the expectation disconnect is that the motion is 
traveling back and forth so I would expect to specify the travel in a 
range, or from relative (0,0,0) to some distance.


load/edit existing configuration in stepconf wizard:

When I try this it does not let me actually load anything.  It appears 
like it is looking for different file names or is looking in the wrong 
directory.  The overall effect is that I cannot edit a configuration 
with the GUI, and either have to edit the files by hand or build a new 
configuration from scratch.


Gecko G540 defaults not in line predefined requirements:

There are a number of known predefined configuration parameters for the 
G540 which are not set up by default.  These include:

   Each axis microstepping is hard coded as 10.

   pin-16 *must be* set to the charge pump, or you cannot turn on the 
charge pump.

I'll post other observations and/or bugs as I get back to rebuilding 
the machine.


Once again, I am sorry for not checking these against the latest 
repository source, but it will be weeks before I get a chance.

   Best regards,

   EBo --


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How fast is your code?
3 out of 4 devs don\\\'t know how their code performs in production.
Find out how slow your code is with AppDynamics Lite.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219672;13503038;z?
http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to