On 6 December 2012 14:15, EBo <[email protected]> wrote: > A couple of minor points. The bins as they first were give were almost > exponentially increasing. Instead of setting them up as > 1,2,5,10,20,50,100... If we use a strict 2^N, 3^N, 10^N or some such, > then it fits the exponential model better. This is the equivalent of > taking the log transform of the input data...
This is probably a good idea, as there are a lot more "slots" out there at the edge. ie, there are only 40 bins in the +/-20us range, whereas the statistical likelyhood of events in the 2980 to 3020us range is rather less. This will tend to shrink the apparent height of the curve at the larger latencies. -- atp If you can't fix it, you don't own it. http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
