Where does a request for a gcode 'improvement' fit into the grand scheme of 
things?

I can see that there is a good argument for implementing something like 
G33.1 in a manner that duplicated what other controllers do, its a good 
argument.

However, in the case of G33.1, I also see a glaring need for an improvement 
in how it handles the "reverse" points.  The existing code allows the 
locked motion to continue, and TBT if the plain G33 also did that, by 
establishing a mode that enabled the synchronized motion that had to be 
specifically turned off, we could then code around the G33.1's limitations, 
which are, if tapping a blind hole, and it coasts too far, the tap will hit 
the bottom of the hole & shatter, breaking off in the hole.  This is not a 
Good Thing.

I have an idea of adding a switch to control an 'auto-tune' of this 
function, very useful when writing a peck tap routine, basically by 
snapshotting the position at the point the reversal command is given, then 
watching and catching the overshoot ( or undershoot, as the case may be ) 
and adjusting the reversal point so that the overshoot then hits the target 
depth on the next cycle of the pecking.  The backout point could be 
similarly treated, and doing so would double the cycle frequency in my 
case.  More tapped holes per hour on the production line=more efficiency 
for the job shop.

Is there a special category for requests such as this?

Cheers, Gene
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
My web page: <http://coyoteden.dyndns-free.com:85/gene> is up!
My views 
<http://www.armchairpatriot.com/What%20Has%20America%20Become.shtml>
BOFH excuse #168:

le0: no carrier: transceiver cable problem?
A pen in the hand of this president is far more
dangerous than 200 million guns in the hands of
         law-abiding citizens.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to