I think I was one of the last people to support RTL, and that was back in 2004 +/-1. If you want I will give the appropriate people a poke and see what they want to do.
EBo -- On Jul 21 2014 1:52 PM, Jeff Epler wrote: > I have never heard of anyone using this port since 2006, if not > earlier. > > I have been unable to find any evidence that there are even public > kernel patches for 2.6.x let alone 3.y kernels. (and while there > used > to be patches for kernel 2.4, they also appear to have evaporated > from > the internet). > > If no one wishes to step forward as a maintainer of this RTAPI > implementation (known as rtl in our source tree), I think we should > just > delete it from our master branch. Barring an offer to maintain that > code, I'll do this sometime after August 1. > > This would, in theory, reduce the number of supported RTOSes from 3 > to > 2, but I really don't think anybody's going to be crying over this > one. > > Jeff > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index > and > search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck > Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code > search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds > _______________________________________________ > Emc-developers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
