On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 08:54:07PM +0200, Michael Büsch wrote: > Another thing is the sincos configure test we do. > What does it test? Userspace or kernelspace? Or both?
Configure tests userspace. It's always assumed there's no sincos in kernel space -- sincos.c: 22 #if defined(__KERNEL__) 23 #undef HAVE_SINCOS 24 #endif A slight complicating factor is HAVE___SINCOS, which is again determined by configure checking userspace; if HAVE___SINCOS were defined then I think the kernel would end up without a definition of sincos. But on my debian 7 system, the configure result for the function __sincos is 'no', so this doesn't come up. > What happens, if I have a userspace with sincos and kernelspace > without sincos (like in my case)? Does it work correctly and compile in > the workaround for kernelspace posemath and leave it out for userspace > posemath? Yes, that is what is intended to happen. Jeff > > Please CC me in replies, so I can respond faster without reading the list. > > -- > Michael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
