On 12/12/2015 08:03 PM, Jeff Epler wrote:
> On IRC, seb mentioned considering whether to merge the rtai-5 branch
> (suitably rebased, I assume) to 2.7.  To complement my earlier review
> notes on the rtai-5 branch, I offer these notes about my perspective on
> merging to the stable branch.
> 
>  - should backport the realtime-math test if we do this

That's a little tricky.  It would have to be a limited version of the
test, since the current test fails on older versions of our RTAI
packages, due to an advertised but missing realtime math function (I
forget which one it was, but obviously one we never use).

I guess the thing to do would be to change the header file to test the
RTAI version, and only export the function if the underlying RTAI
exports it.  Then somehow in the test we'd try to detect if the function
is exported, and only test it if it exists.  Ok, that all sounds doable.


>  - udev is a new dependency, though probably not a large one.

I think that part is in error and should be removed.

I'm looking at reimplementing the CheckLoaded() function in the realtime
script correctly, so that it actually checks for the condition that will
allow the realtime environment to be used.  The udev thing seemed like a
good idea at the time, but i think you pointed out it's been deprecated
for some time now.


>  - check whether the -msse block change can be dropped, since
>    rtai-5's rtai-config will get this right now

I'll look into it.  I owe you a response to some of your review comments
from last time too.


> Honestly I feel like it's a pretty minor change.  If buildbot doesn't
> turn up any problems, I'm not too worried about shipping it in 2.7.

I agree.  We'll see how it goes.


-- 
Sebastian Kuzminsky

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to