OK.  So we went from "change nothing" to doing something which is not 
only necessary for a few, but also darn right practical.  No, this all 
sounds good.  I was not aware of the 59 item limit. 256 (8-bit int) or 
64K (16-bit int) seems more reasonable.  For James example I would lean 
towards a 16-bit tool number.  It is also possible that some of the bits 
could be used for status indication and we actually end up with 
something like 12-bits of tool numbers and 4 bits for status.

If we need a full on relational database, then fine, but I simply not 
seeing it.  I understand Sarah's desire to have something easily 
portable to what she is currently using.  But if we are simply linking 
tables and not doing sophisticated queries and joins and ..., then 
requiring maintenance of a full SQL database is adding to the complexity 
of the toolchain overmuch.  I would offer that we should accommodate 
export tools to save in MSQL, Postgress, etc.  So I will ask my question 
again "what is the most maintainable long term solution?"  All that 
said, I doubt that I will have time to help on this one and will simply 
use whatever the developers come up with.  That said, I see this as a 
maintenance nightmare.

On Oct 26 2016 2:31 AM, James Waples wrote:
> Machines with more than 56 tools are becoming a lot more common so 
> removing
> this arbitrary limit would be quite important to a lot of people. 
> From a
> personal standpoint, I would like to be able to group my tools by 
> number
> (0-99 for endmills, 100-199 for drills, etc). I tried this once 
> before but
> was surprised by an error when I tried adding tool T100. Sounds like
> there's some technical debt that would be good to clean up.
>
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 at 21:35 EBo <e...@sandien.com> wrote:
>
>> On Oct 25 2016 9:03 AM, andy pugh wrote:
>> > On 25 October 2016 at 15:25, EBo <e...@sandien.com> wrote:
>> >> That said, what is the most maintainable long term
>> >> solution?
>> >
>> > Change nothing....
>>
>> Then why did the subject come up in the first place?  Isn't there 
>> bugs
>> that is causing issues and problems are arising?
>>
>>    EBo --
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> The Command Line: Reinvented for Modern Developers
>> Did the resurgence of CLI tooling catch you by surprise?
>> Reconnect with the command line and become more productive.
>> Learn the new .NET and ASP.NET CLI. Get your free copy!
>> http://sdm.link/telerik
>> _______________________________________________
>> Emc-developers mailing list
>> Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
>>
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The Command Line: Reinvented for Modern Developers
> Did the resurgence of CLI tooling catch you by surprise?
> Reconnect with the command line and become more productive.
> Learn the new .NET and ASP.NET CLI. Get your free copy!
> http://sdm.link/telerik
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-developers mailing list
> Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Command Line: Reinvented for Modern Developers
Did the resurgence of CLI tooling catch you by surprise?
Reconnect with the command line and become more productive. 
Learn the new .NET and ASP.NET CLI. Get your free copy!
http://sdm.link/telerik
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to