On Sunday 24 March 2019 13:53:52 andy pugh wrote: > The link again, in case it doesn't highlight in a title: > https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/issues/572 > > Does anyone with a better memory than me remember what might have > caused this? > > I seem to remember an attempt to recover the "state" at a > run-from-line but can't find the commit by searching for "run from > line" > > I feel that perhaps tool-changes should be deferred until actually at > the start line.
And then only if the tool in the spindle is not the tool this code expects. It will be more complex to analyze the code from line 1, tracking the tool number, and if at arriving at line NN to to restart, the mounted tool and the tracked tool don't match, then trigger the tool change. So I would add "new" in front of the "start"ing line above. Reducing the ambiguity. Worth 2 cents? IDK. Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene> _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
