Oops, sorry I fell into an old trap. So long since I worried about this. That will just be for that segment. I did not notice you were referring to a test branch. I'll check it out. Rod Webster *1300 896 832* +61 435 765 611 VMN® www.vmn.com.au
On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 12:51, Chris Morley <chrisinnana...@hotmail.com> wrote: > My work is not in master - confirmed. > requested-vel pin has been there for a long time and is not the Fcode > number - though is related to it. > The pin I added is called (badly named) base-feedrate and is the actual > Fcode number from gcode. > > But the good news is if requested-vel works for you then it's available > now! > But I would check that it is in sync with the program. > > Chris > > ________________________________ > From: Rod Webster <r...@vmn.com.au> > Sent: March 23, 2020 11:56 PM > To: EMC developers <emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net> > Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] correct F code status message - opinions > > Chris, look again. It is there on a run in place compile of master branch. > And the HTML man page is updated for it too. Keep it there please! > > Rod Webster > *1300 896 832* > +61 435 765 611 > VMN® > www.vmn.com.au<http://www.vmn.com.au> > > > > On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 09:29, Chris Morley <chrisinnana...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > > Rod > > Sorry I didn't make that clear - it's not in master yet and if it does it > > will probably change a bit, but thank you for testing. > > I did think about you guys hence the HAL pin. > > > > Chris > > ________________________________ > > From: Rod Webster <r...@vmn.com.au> > > Sent: March 23, 2020 10:52 PM > > To: EMC developers <emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net> > > Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] correct F code status message - opinions > > > > Great work Chris, Confirmed as working here now on V 2.9 on my machine > > Its interesting to watch motion.current_vel and your new > > motion.requested-vel pins in halshow while running a job. > > This will be very handy for plasma cutting. > > > > And yes, state tags beckons if you feel the urge now you got this far. > > > > Rod Webster > > *1300 896 832* > > +61 435 765 611 > > VMN® > > www.vmn.com.au<http://www.vmn.com.au> > > > > > > > > On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 22:20, Amit Goradia <amitgora...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 23 Mar, 2020, 1:25 pm Chris Morley, < > chrisinnana...@hotmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I have been delving deeper into linuxcnc to see if I could correct > the > > > > status of F code. > > > > For those who don't know the Fcode status report in AXIS (or any gui) > > is > > > > actually the status of the interpreter rather then the current Fcode. > > If > > > > you have a long program that changes the fcode lat in the program you > > > will > > > > see that f code before you should. > > > > > > > > I have code that works; it reports through status the current F code, > > and > > > > it outputs a HAL pin of current F code. > > > > I'm not sure I've done it right of course. > > > > > > > > It does this by sending a new NML message to motion each time the F > > code > > > > changes. > > > > When that message gets to Motion, it updates status and the HAL pin. > > > > Since it's read from the interpreted list, it is in sync with the > > actual > > > F > > > > code. > > > > > > > > Currently the message is called feedrate or base_feedrate which needs > > to > > > > be changed probably to F_code. > > > > Then I was thinking S code should probably be updated in sync too. > > > > Rather then having a message per code I could call the message > > sync_code > > > > and add other codes to it. > > > > > > > > Opinions ? is this the wrong way to go? > > > > Does my code look wrong? (most of it is boiler code actually) > > > > > > > > You can see the commits here (top 6): > > > > https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/commits/feedcode_message > > > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Emc-developers mailing list > > > > Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Chris > > > > > > Have you looked at the statetags branch? > > > It was trying to accomplish something similar in a generic manner. > > > -automata > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Emc-developers mailing list > > > Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Emc-developers mailing list > > Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Emc-developers mailing list > > Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers > > > > _______________________________________________ > Emc-developers mailing list > Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers > > _______________________________________________ > Emc-developers mailing list > Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers > _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
