Scary is a good way to describe it! I wish the interplay between all the
components was easier to understand and work on.

-Rob

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020, 3:38 PM Chris Morley <chrisinnana...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> Well obviously I didn't check the code - it never occurred to me that
> there wouldn't be a motion command to change offset, but as you said motion
> doesn't need to know abut it it's baked into the actual command for
> movement.
>
> Thanks for setting me straight on that guys.
> It's interesting to get into it a bit (and a little scary).
>
> Chris
> ________________________________
> From: Robert Ellenberg <rwe...@gmail.com>
> Sent: March 31, 2020 7:07 PM
> To: EMC developers <emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] improve synchronization between backend and
> UI
>
> Chris, unfortunately G10 doesn't send any "motion" commands, it directly
> changes the work offsets in interp (where they live), and if the changed
> offset is active, sends canon commands to update the current offset values.
> Those commands never make it to motion. Canon is basically synchronized
> with interp, but task and motion lag behind.
>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-developers mailing list
> Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
>

_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to