> On 3 Apr 2020, at 9:57 pm, andy pugh <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 23:01, John Thornton <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Is there a way to do a test release just to see if we have all our ducks >> in a row? > > I tried to create a test-ISO before Christmas, but found that I didn't > know how to get the packages properly signed and in the right places > on the server. > I do have access to the server. > > There seems to be quite a lot of momentum behind offering a Mint based > ISO. I haven't yet decided if we want to offer 4 variants or just two.
From a maintenance point I would be tempted to have just one PREEMPT-RT ISO and one RTAI ISO. I would prefer Mate over XFCE from an ease of use point and I think most user nowdays would be using machines plenty capable of running Mate plus it is not really too difficult for a user to change desktops. > I don't think that there is a way to offer a choice of kernel / > realtime on one ISO disc. > > At the moment I think that packages on the repository are generated by > the buildbot. (Perhaps Seb can confirm that). > > At the moment the buildbot is making packages for Buster / Preempt RT. > > What other platforms would we like to support? Would we expect to drop any? > > Is it more practical to add remote buildslaves to support extra > platforms or to try to add more to Seb's (possibly already over-taxed) > buildfarm? I would be willing to run a slave or two if we go in that direction. > > -- > atp > "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is > designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and > lunatics." > — George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912 > > > _______________________________________________ > Emc-developers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
