Robert Ellenberg wrote :
>I agree, the motion / TP component now is doing work that doesn't have to
>be in real-time. Specifically, the queueing of motion commands and the
>lookahead optimization could be done in a user space component. You'd need
>a real-time safe queue structure to do it, but it would make the
>optimization part much easier to implement. I believe OpenCN took this
>approach, and a similar design was.proposed years ago for Machinekit as
>well.
I actually didn't have a look at OpenCN code, so I cannot tell about that.
As far as what I think about machinekit. The planned approach was really nice
and
using zmq as messaging system has quite potential.
But before I moved away from machinekit, back to lcnc, the guys at machinekit
focussed a lot more on implementing gimmicks instead a reliable, easy to handle
system.
Don't know what's the actual state there by now.
Somebody knows of some sort of compare nml and zmq?
ju
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
