On Sonntag, 7. Juni 2020, 17:36:17 CEST andy pugh wrote: > That seems like a suspiciously large performance increase. > Do runtests still pass?
What's the sense of runtests? My debug sessions showed, that stored G5x could never have been tested. Same is true for tool length compensation. Or if there exists tests for that, that tests have never been validated by manual calculations. The bug I found was used unconditionally on every run. And I'm quite sure, that the bug affects imperial systems too. linuxcnc supports the most ridiculous functionality but has no tests for the very basics? What's the sense of all that testing then? I of cause did only test the basics, that I use. The diffs I sent where captured by "diff -Naur" which means, you can apply the code changes by running "patch" automatically. But that diffs are the improvement only. To fix the bug, you should follow my description. Its just a one liner. cheers Reinhard _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
