>I don't really understand the need to rush it out right now. I know it has been a long time coming but if it seems this bug can be fixed in the foreseeable future we may as well wait a bit longer. >If folk need 2.8 it is really not too difficult to get.
But Phill, we said that two years ago....... Its time to call it. How many are deterred from trying linuxcnc because its so dated? Rod Webster *1300 896 832* +61 435 765 611 VMN® www.vmn.com.au On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 at 09:46, Alec Ari via Emc-developers < emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Well, how often are isos made? If it's every 5 years or something like > that, then I'd say what's a few more weeks or a month? If Paolo doesn't > respond or can't figure it out in time for us, and there's a big need for a > new iso right away, then leaving it out of the disc image wouldn't be a bad > option. Just don't be trigger happy to drop RTAI support just because _you_ > don't need it. > > I'm not even a machinist, I don't do anything with LinuxCNC except the > RTOS side of things, but I don't see LinuxCNC as a useless project. That's > what sync (whoever he is) on IRC doesn't understand. There's more to this > world than just _him_. A prime example of the selfish children I was > referring to in my previous email. RTAI offers lower latency than > PREEMPT_RT and for some applications, PREEMPT_RT will not make the cut. > > I'll post the script right now from Andy to the RTAI mailing list and see > what happens. > > > _______________________________________________ > Emc-developers mailing list > Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers > _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers