Gene,
On line# 157 you have a “{“ following the IF rather than a “[“.
See if fixing that helps?
Alan
> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 17:28:07 -0400
> From: gene heskett <ghesk...@shentel.net>
> To: EMC developers <emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: [Emc-developers] bug (new?)in master
> Message-ID: <4e6ff28a-4d3a-c1d4-1c56-cf3f3f02a...@shentel.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> Greetings all;
>
> I keep getting a squawk about line 160 on a code reload of this sequence
> in my proggy's main loop:
>
> 157 o01 IF {#<_do100> GT .5]
> 158 o100 CALL (with a trailing comment about whats done in this style)
> 159 M2 (done if do100 true)
> 160 o01 ELSE (assume its been done)
> 161 #<_ztmp>=-4.0000000
> 162 #<_zbase>=-4.0000000
> 163 o01 ENDIF
>
> But it runs fine if I put that (comment) on a separate line.
> This is a restriction on comment style I don't recall before recently,
> and is probably used 50 more times in this files 220 or so LOC.
>
> Perhaps the ELSE clause needs looked at, my guess is its ignoring the
> opening (
> of the comment since the error msg quotes the whole comment with both ()
> characters.
>
> Thanks all.
>
> Cheers, Gene Heskett.
> --
> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
> soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
> -Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940)
> If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
> - Louis D. Brandeis
> Genes Web page<http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 21:34:25 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Alec Ari <neotheu...@ymail.com>
> To: EMC developers <emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Time to split 2.9 and master?
> Message-ID: <559060263.609004.1663796065...@mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> To clarify, I wasn't implying it meant anything different. The SIGFPE
> problem is fixed anyway so disregard my previous email.
>
> Alec
>
>
> On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 10:47:34 AM CDT, andy pugh <
> bodge...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 21 Sept 2022 at 15:05, Chris Morley <chrisinnana...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I think we should make the branch now. Making the branch does not
> preclude
> > doing finishing work in the branch.
>
>
> Indeed, it just makes "master" back into more of a testing playground.
>
>
> --
> atp
> "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is designed
> for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and lunatics."
> ? George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-developers mailing list
> Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 14:05:51 +0200
> From: J?r?mie Tarot <silopo...@gmail.com>
> To: EMC developers <emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Time to split 2.9 and master?
> Message-ID:
> <
> cach-gsghxezzqr+0qaotktv6qzqwfops+rselory0ckw98r...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Le mer. 21 sept. 2022 ? 04:24, Phill Carter <phillcarte...@gmail.com> a
> ?crit :
> >
> > > On 21 Sep 2022, at 6:59 am, andy pugh <bodge...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I have some plasmac work that I would like to push before that happens.
> It should be completed by the end of this month.
>
> As said in an earlier message, I believe [Qt]PlasmaC as well as the other
> UIs should have their own repositories and packages to unleash their
> development and release cycle. Of course the fact that PlasmaC embeds a HAL
> component together with configs for two UIs doesn't help... ?
>
> This could also be a good incentive for the projects to upgrade and
> standardize API and messaging between "core" and UIs.
>
> > I also have a question regarding packaging. Is there any good reason that
> we have a separate "-dev" package ?
>
> This is to have a finer grained packaging allowing to install and maintain
> just and only what's needed on each system. In the true spirit of *NIX,
> Debian and embedded/industrial systems design.
> There's still to be done on this matter until a PlasmaC integrator just
> have to `apt install plasmac` to install a slimmed and ready to configure
> controller, without any unneeded code, be it because it's only used by
> other UIs/VCPs or because it's only useful for developers.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 14:07:09 +0200
> From: J?r?mie Tarot <silopo...@gmail.com>
> To: EMC developers <emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Time to split 2.9 and master?
> Message-ID:
> <CACH-gSGjNWM1swKinHu8HMLs=
> n1pxtgko8k9pxgkdses9hm...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Le mar. 20 sept. 2022 ? 23:04, andy pugh <bodge...@gmail.com> a ?crit :
>
> > Is it time to split 2.9 off as a stable-ish branch with a 2.9.0~pre0 tag?
>
>
> Would gladly hear the opinion of the "docs team" chaps about this :)
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-developers mailing list
> Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of Emc-developers Digest, Vol 197, Issue 47
> ***********************************************
>
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
