I’m fairly familiar with machine kit and it has nothing to do with that. It has strictly to do with modernizing the built in remote interface that Linuxcnc was born with..
I think that this will get done individuals like me that get together and see the advantages that this offers. I usually get referred to machinekit liked you did which is really like saying go away, we don’t want to hear this because it is not compatible with existing plans and therefore rejected. Using this method can allow any Ui including your efforts to function with minimum changes and with mostly the addition of a built in secure TCP interface. It would be nice if you could help with development of the Python version of the proposed interface. Johannes - Fairbanks, AK 99712 > On Dec 3, 2022, at 10:58 AM, Chris Morley <chrisinnana...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Have you looked at machinekit code? Is that similar to what you want? > > Chris > > > > Sent from my Galaxy > > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Johannes P Fassotte <johan...@automationassist.com> > Date: 2022-12-03 11:48 a.m. (GMT-08:00) > To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [Emc-developers] A vision for working now to LinuxCnc version 10 > > In order to help clarify what I would like to see in not only version 10 > of LinuxCnc but also in the current version 9 future work. I will start > working on this as soon as my new circuits board for my metal detectors > are populated with all the SMD components. The circuit blank circuit > boards arrived yesterday. This requires placing 235 SMD componets on > each of the boards and likely take about seven days. > > My goal for LinuxCnc is to provide a way for any user to interface any > UI to LinuxCnc with a secure TCP network connection. LinuxCnc has had > such an interface from its inception via the NML network servers however > these are absolutely insecure and anyone with a bit of knowledge of > remote NML commands can take control of LinuxCnc if those network ports > are left open. Thus LinuxCnc needs modern secure network interfaces to > replace the ones that were designed in from the very start government > development and just ignored. Not many use this interface because it > does not provide complete information due to developers add-ons such as > Python that seem to just live in their own world within LinuxCnc and do > not provide any info into the NML network links. NML is likely the > hardest thing to deal with and very difficult to replace but in general > works just fine. > > About 12 years ago I developed code to allow remote control of a lot of > time sensitive industrial and electronic equipment that was over 500 > miles from the actual normal user interface. The equipment being > remotely controlled was located in a isolated area and without > communication links and thus those also had to be designed and > implemented. The overall bandwidth of the communication link was divided > into remote receive data, multiple command channels, status and error > channels. The system was designed for very high reliability and met all > design goals and is still in operation with some equipment updates > having been made. > > The goal of me mentioning this is that I know that having a distributed > data system with equipment to be controlled in one location and the user > interface in an other more convenient location doe not have to suffer > from reliability issues when properly executed. What it does provide is > flexibility. In case of LinuxCnc which runs on Linux user interfaces and > there support requirements can be offloaded from the Linux system and > run on Windows based system instead or even on another Linux Based > computer. Which as I mentioned before reduces the need to load up the > machine control computer with support code that is not directly related > to its main function which if of course to control a machine and output > status info back to the user and process commands from the UI that may > be located some distance away and not in a noisy environment. There are > of coarse other ways to snoop into a Machine controller and some have > implemented one or more o those methods strictly because LinuxCnc does > not have a proper way of handing remote UI's. > > I thing that even version 9 master has a good deal of the required code > to fix that problem by just adding some code to do some data routing and > adding some secure TCP channels. I have drawn a basic block diagram of > what would be required and attached it. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Emc-developers mailing list > Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
