The question is why 'linuxcncrsh' (ie the LinuxCNC remote shell code)
treats ABC axes as RPW while it does not seem to recognize UVW axes at
all and if that should maybe be changed to reflect the axis descriptors
currently used in LinuxCNC. (ie XYZABCUVW)
The remote shell code has not seen much work since it's inception 20
years ago and it seems that the person who developed it might have used
it to control a robot, so 'roll', 'pitch', 'yaw' would have been
applicable to that particular use case. Since Linuxcnc is not limited
and indeed not primarily targeted to be used with robots or other
applications where 'roll','pitch' and 'yaw' make sense it seems that the
remote shell should probably just use the same axes letters used
everywhere else in the code.
Greetings
David
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
