On 10/23/26 4:10 PM, Robert Schöftner wrote:
I think discourse deployment is recommended via the docker image.
Maintenance should be limited to keeping the docker image up to date and
happy. Though I don't really like the "hiding" of all the stuff, docker
just really is a fancy chroot, and IME it works fine and takes the
hassle out of keeping up to date with dependencies and security updates.
That would put you in the situation that you download a docker image,
which you have no control over how it was built. Otherwise, you need to
rebuild it for every change and are again in the same position I
described before. It is essentially a >borked< if you do and >borked< if
you don't situation.
What can be created from the Debian repositories (or other distros)?
That has generally a long life and a well-defined update/upgrade path.
It is better to reduce bells and whistles for stability as well as easy
and ordered system administration.
discourse itself is GPL2
https://github.com/discourse/discourse/blob/main/LICENSE.txt
Yes, it is FOSS. But, its not about the license as such. Its about the
deployment and the effort it takes to keep it running and up-to-date
without any data loss, doing so with the available resources.
--
Greetings Bertho
(disclaimers are disclaimed)
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers