Reply to: RE>>EN61000-4-6 ? Mark,
Please refer to the ENV 50141:1993 - "Forward". There is a note which states the following: " When the corresponding DIS prepared by IEC has successfully passed the IEC/CENELEC parallel vote and has been ratified as EN, the present ENV will be immediately withdrawn.". I think this statement answers your question. Regards, Dean Jurgensen NORTEL - IBCS Calgary -------------------------------------- List-Post: [email protected] Date: 96/11/24 9:04 PM To: Dean Jurgensen From: Mark Briggs ----- E X T E R N A L L Y O R I G I N A T E D M E S S A G E ----- In addition to Brian's question - even when these standards are officially released and listed in the OJ can you use them when testing to generic standards ?? Since the generic heavy industrial standard references ENV50140/50141 that surely means that to test to the generic requires testing to the ENVs ? Opinions appreciated... Mark At 10:07 AM 11/21/96 MST, you wrote: > Quick question. > > Has EN61000-4-6 and/or IEC1000-4-6 been officially released? > > I have the pre-leased version ENV50141. > > How about ENV50140 and ENV50204? > > Thanks, > > Brian Kunde > LECO Corp. > > > ------------------ RFC822 Header Follows ------------------ Received: by nmisq2.miss.nt.com with SMTP;24 Nov 1996 21:01:37 -0500 Received: from corpgate.rich.nt.com by nrtpm9c1.rtp.nt.com with SMTP (1.38.193.4/16.2) id AA07750; Sun, 24 Nov 96 21:01:25 -0500 Received: from ruebert.ieee.org by corpgate.rich.nt.com with SMTP (PP); Mon, 25 Nov 1996 02:01:04 +0000 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by ruebert.ieee.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id UAA01652 for emc-pstc-list; Sun, 24 Nov 1996 20:16:00 -0500 (EST) List-Post: [email protected] Date: Sun, 24 Nov 1996 17:12:46 -0800 Message-Id: <[email protected]> X-Sender: [email protected] X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (16) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Brian Kunde <[email protected]>, [email protected] From: Mark Briggs <[email protected]> Subject: Re: EN61000-4-6 ? Sender: [email protected] Precedence: bulk Reply-To: Mark Briggs <[email protected]> X-Resent-To: Multiple Recipients <[email protected]> X-Listname: emc-pstc X-List-Description: Product Safety Tech. Committee, EMC Society X-Info: Help requests to [email protected] X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to [email protected] X-Moderator-Address: [email protected]
