Hi Vic:
     
     You have mentioned the CTE directive and that is a subject that has 
     had no mention of lately.  
     
     I attended the CommEd conference on March 26th - 28th and the main 
     topic was supposed to be the CTE directive.  Well, we received little 
     to no information!  Piero Ravaioli, Head of Division DG XIII, 
     addressed the delegates but did not say much.  We were expecting the 
     CTE directive to be talked about in detail and it simply was not 
     ready.  Did your conference go any better?  I would be interested in 
     finding out any details you, or anyone else, might have picked up.
     
     About the only information we received was that the CTE directive 
     should (who knows) open up the self-declaration route to approvals 
     even more.  As you can now self declare to safety and EMC, you may be 
     able to do the same for some/all of the telecom portion of the 
     requirements.
     
     Looking forward to some feedback.
     
     Best Regards, Mike.
     ________________________________________________
     Michael Miele                      Phone:  508-656-9360
     Telebit Corporation                Fax:    508-656-9352
     One Executive Drive                E-mail: [email protected]
     Chelmsford, MA 01824 USA

     


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Who can apply the CE Mark?
Author:  "Victor L. Boersma" <[email protected]> at Internet
List-Post: [email protected]
Date:    4/30/96 12:23 AM


I attended a conference in Amsterdam on March 18th (had to dump my 
poor wife in a motel on Cocoa Beach for the week-end to do it) where 
Mr. Joergen Richter of DG XIII introduced a draft for the new 
Connected Telecommunications Directive (CTE).  The gist of the
story is that the Commission is having a change of heart on how to 
best regulate.  The point was made repeatedly that under the current 
system they can't track the original parties that made the 
declaration.  They want to go even so far that they want the notified 
bodies to hold the files WITHOUT LOOKING AT THE FILES and require 
that the EC mark comes with the number of the notified body that 
holds the files, even for a Module A conformity assessment. (Needless 
to say, the Notified Bodies were less than enthralled with that 
notion).  The fun is only beginning.
     
Regards,
     
     
Vic

Reply via email to