Reply to:   FWD>RE>>Limited Power Source

Egon H. Varju wrote:

> On 20/4/1996 Kendal Wilcox wrote:

>>     I was discussing UL 1950/CSA950/EN60950 clause 2.11, Limited Power 
>>     Source with a colleague, and we were looking at the Table 9 limits for
>>     maximum output current Isc (1000/Uoc) and maximum VA (250).  If Uoc is
>>     20V, then Isc is 1000/20 = 50A max.  However, 20V X 50A = 1000VA.

>>     It seems like if the maximum allowable VA is 250 and Uoc is 20V, then
>>     the maximum current is limited to 250/20 = 12.5A.

>Please note that the purpose of Table 9 is to determine the value of the
>overcurrent protection device that must be provided.  These are not the
>allowable power and/or current limits of a limited power circuit.

This is not quite true; the intent is *not* exclusively to determine fuse 
overcurrent protection value.  The intent is that, if a limited power circuit 
is needed or required for a load and the source output circuit impedances 
(capacity) are insufficient to limit the output current (not inherently 
limited), a fuse *may* be used to create a limited power circuit.  If a fuse is 
the limiting device of choice, then the source must not be capable of 
delivering more than the specified values of current and power.

Because the fuse can be somewhat generic (though generally must have been 
evaluated as suitable for the purpose), no particular I^2*t figure is 
applicable; therefore, a limitation of output current is placed on the source.  
The reason for a maximum power value is somewhat more gray to me, but was 
probably a compromise on what was felt or known to present a reasonable ability 
to initiate a fire in materials common when the tables in the US and Canadian 
electrical codes were written (a long time ago).

>1.  The <1000/Uoc and <250VA limits with the overcurrent protector BYPASSED.

Quite so.  The limits apply to the source, as if the fuse and load were not 
there.

>2.  Uoc is open cct voltage.  When you load the cct to max current, the output
>voltage will usually drop and the VA will be less than Uoc x Isc.

True again; especially of linear power sources, where the output voltage 
essentially drops to zero (though some fraction of a volt is still present and 
must exist in order to drive the current).  Nonlinear loads, like switching 
power supplies, normally don't get close enough to 0 V to be thought of as a 
short circuit, before they shut down.

>3.  The <250VA limit is another, separate, requirement.  If the VA in Item 2
>above exceeds 250VA, then 250VA becomes the limit.

The last sentence isn't clear.  I assume you mean that if the measured Uoc and 
Isc values are multiplied together, and that result exceeds 250 VA, a separate 
measurement is needed for power.  The 250 VA limit is the power delivered into 
the Norton equivalent impedance (although, a resistive or active load is 
normally used) of the power source (maximum power transfer).

>4.  After all the above tests, then you must provide a fuse (last column of
>Table 9).  Using your example, with a 20V cct, you will need to provide a 5A
>fuse.  So, no, you will never get a continuous 1000VA or 12.5A.

Up to 20 Voc, the limit for fuse rating is 5.0 A.  Above 5.0 A, the maximum 
fuse size is based on calculation and the result can't exceed 1/10 of Isc.

>Egon Varju
>CSA Pacific Region

Peter L. Tarver
Northern Telecom, Inc.
[email protected]

Reply via email to