Hi Tania,

I am 99% sure this is a Japanese company/distributor.  I have
a sample bag of similar parts and there is Japanese kanji on
the bag so that is a tip-off.  Unfortunately, there is no more info
on the bag.

I don't think that any one company has a material that is that much more
special than the others.  But there are different materials that
can significantly affect ferrite performance, and you need to choose
the right one for the frequency to be attenuated.

Typically, people use type 43 (from Fair-Rite) which is very similar
in performance to type 28 (from Steward).  These materials are optimized
for lower frequency use (30 MHz to 200 MHz).  If you are trying to
attenuate higher frequencies, there is the less commonly used
type 61 (Fair-Rite) which is similar to type 25 (Steward).  These
alternate materials are better optimized to the frequency range of
200 MHz to 500 MHz.

If you have trouble sourcing the KG part, you may want to consider the
above materials in a split bead (clamshell construction) that is
similarly sized to the KG or larger.  I would suspect that  either 43/28 or 
61/25,
appropriately sized should work.  And they are readily available through
a number of distributors.

Good luck.
[email protected]

 ----------
From: tania.grant
To: emc-pstc
Subject: Can someone identify this ferrite?
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: Thursday, April 10, 1997 7:02PM

     While performing emission testing, we have discovered that a certain
     ferrite performed better than some others, however, we cannot identify
     the source.

     It is a standard issue, almost square, clamshell type housing to be
     used with a cable approximately 10 mm diameter, with an outer
     off-white plastic case with the following markings:

               KG (italics) inside a rectangle, molded on one side

               SFC-10  sticky-on white label on the other side

     If anyone is familiar with this type, I would be most grateful if you
     could identify it.  Thank you.

          Tania Grant, Octel Communications Corporation
          [email protected]

Reply via email to