Randall;

The routing of 1GHz traces has many obstacles. Following are a few (not an 
exhaustive list)

1) dielectric "constant" value variance
2) cross talk
3) source termination
4) source impedance
4) end-line termination
5) common mode generation
6) component inability to handle 1GHz signals
7) mismatched impedances
8) vias
9) turns and corners of traces
10) PCB material
11) connectors and headers, etc. etc.

One advice is to keep the trace on one plane only. No vias, and use rounded 
turns.

For additional signal integrity (less emissions is a benefactor of good 
S.I.) you will have to use differential transmission lines, i.e. two traces 
for each signal. Those have to be kept precisely at the same distance apart 
and driven from differential drivers. 

The impedance of the transmission line is not so important as long it is 
held constant. (Unless you are driving external devices) Remember that it 
is difficult to get high impedances (over 50 Ohm) on a typical multilayer 
PCB. 

There are signal integrity programs that do just what you want but they are 
not cheap! visit the University of Missouri at Rolla web-site (something 
like UMR.emclab.edu or close to that) You will find a treasure of 
information there.

Hans Mellberg
EMC Consultant

______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: PWB Layout for high frequency traces...
Author:  Non-HP-owner-emc-pstc ([email protected]) at 
hp-boise,uugw2
List-Post: [email protected]
Date:    02/03/97 03:06 PM



Hello all,

I am looking for a method to determine the minimum distance which I can 
route 1 GHz traces from other devices (including metal pin row headers) 
without compromising the EMC performance (characteristic impedance) of the 
traces, while preventing any common-mode coupling to the other devices.

Any formulas, suggestions, or ideas are appreciated.  Also, if anyone knows 
of any EMC layout modelling software which addresses this issue, please let 
me know.

Thank you,


Randall T. Flinders
Emulex Corporation
[email protected]

Reply via email to