I agree with the concept of a world wide standard - with more & more countries signing up to CISPR 22 that is happening. I believe what is really needed is consistent application of EMC legislation. The varying definitions on a country by country basis of commercial/residential and verification vs. certification approval is MORE frustrating to me. Charles Grasso EMC Engineer StorageTek Tel:(303)673-2908 Fax(303)661-7115
---------- From: Upson,Darrell[SMTP:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, April 17, 1997 5:15 AM To: emd-pstc group Subject: Re: Koreans EMC Approvals Ed, Had to send this again as it didn't go through the first time. ---------- From: Upson,Darrell To: 'emc-pstc' Subject: Re: Koreans EMC Approvals List-Post: [email protected] Date: Wednesday, April 09, 1997 5:52AM Ed, Thanks Ed for saying what was so obvious but you were the only one to speak up. What we all need is a world-wide standard. Everyone would benefit, instead we have to provide certification for Europe, North America, Australia, etc. There are over 300 countries that could be doing this. It must be the test labs that rejoice, while manufacturers waste time and money. Darrell ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------- Thank you, Ryan, for a very clear explanation of one of the most blatant trade barrier schemes I have ever seen. I suppose your ministry of trade wouldn't mind if every one of Korea's trading partners established similar reciprocal policies. -------------------------- Name: Ed Price E-mail: [email protected] List-Post: [email protected] Date: 4/8/97 Time: 12:52:50 PM --------------------------
