To all, I agree with those that are resistant to being subjected to attached graphic files. I, and I'm sure there are others, do not have the time to spend trying to get an attached graphic viewable. I, personally, like text messages because they are very quick to download, the file sizes are typically small, and almost all of the time the pertinent information is described. In my opinion, forcing downloads of emails with attached graphic files is not at all desirable to those with don't want to receive attached files or those with limited resourses.
I think that placing the graphic file in a public place would be the most agreeable since the people that prefer receiving emails with graphic files should have sophisticated enough equipment to do that easily. Just announce where the graphic file is and those that want to can then view the graphic to their heart's delight. In addition, there is always the possibility that an attached file contains (albeit, unintentionally) a virus that may do irreparable damage to an unsuspecting computer. I, for one, am unwilling to risk that. > I also vote for the FTP route. I like Egon's view of "if it's of any > interest to me, I can choose to download it." > Well, that's my 2 cents worth on this late Friday afternoon. Best regards, Ron Pickard
