Massimo,

I am not familiar specifically with LVDS, but I have experience with
very high speed data transfer using differential signaling (Fibre
Channel-like circuitry - 531 MHz fundamental, 1.2 volts on each side).
In my experience, EMI is greatly influenced by imbalance between the two
differential lines.  A difference between the two signal paths produces
an imbalance called delay skew.  Delay skew is an imbalance that creates
a net current down the differential pair.  This net current is a
common-mode current on the pair that must return on the inside of the
shield of the cable.  This makes shielding of the cable (and connector)
important.  

If you don't shield the cable, the common-mode current will still
return, but will find whatever path it can - probably on other wires in
your cable.  This produces an uncontrolled situation in which you, as an
EMI engineer, are at the mercy of fortune.

An impedance discontinuity will cause a reflection of the differential
signal, which may, or may not influence EMI.  EMI is caused by the
common-mode signal.  Since your differential signaling structure
supports both Odd Mode propagation (differential) and Even Mode
propagation (common-mode), you must look at how the impedance
discontinuity appears to the common-mode.  If you get a significant
reflection of the common-mode current, you may increase the apparent
radiated EMI.

So, how should one terminate a differential signaling transmission line?
The safe way is to provide a termination impedance that properly matches
both even and odd modes.  You must characterize the even and odd mode
characteristic impedances of your cable and then provide a matching
network (a Pi, or a T) that will match these two impedances.  The simple
differential termination of a resistor between the two differential
lines can match the Odd Mode, but presents an infinite impedance to the
Even Mode (maximum reflection).  Does this always make a practical
difference in terms of radiated EMI?  No!  It depends a lot on the
details of your system.

Since the differential signal is creating EMI, rather than a clock on
the board, this means that the data pattern of the signal is also an
important factor in determining whether you have an EMI issue.
Repetitive signals are more troublesome than complex data patterns.

A discussion of effects of skew and data patterns may be found in:

Hoeft, L.O., et. al., "Spectral Analysis of Common Mode Currents on
Fibre Channel Shields Due to Skew Imbalance of Differential Signals
Operating at 1.0625Gb/s'" Record of the 1998 IEEE International
Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Denver, Vol. 2, pp. 823-827.

I hope this is helpful.

Jim

Dr. Jim Knighten                e-mail: [email protected]
Senior Consulting Engineer
NCR
17095 Via del Campo
San Diego, CA 92127             http://www.ncr.com
Tel: 619-485-2537
Fax: 619-485-3788


        ----------
        From:  Massimo Polignano
        Sent:  Wednesday, October 14, 1998 12:40 AM
        To:  [email protected]
        Subject:  LVDS technology




        We are about using LVDS (Low Voltage Differential Signaling)
technology to
        transfer high speed video data to a XGA display 1 m from the
driver board.
        Differential signaling is very good to improve EMC
characteristics of the
        link, but in my opinion is also very critical in actual layout:
any lack of
        symmetry can jeopardize its performances.

        Has anybody esperience with these circuits?
        How much EMI behaviour depends on equal signal paths?
        Is it advisable to shield cables?
        What does a discontinuity on the transmission line (change in
        characteristic impedence) produce?

        Thanks in advance for any comment

        Massimo
        -------------------------------------------------------
        ESAOTE S.p.A.                         Massimo Polignano
        Research & Product Development       Regulatory Affairs
        Via di Caciolle,15                   tel:+39.55.4229402
        I- 50127 Florence                    fax:+39.55.4223305
                       e-mail: [email protected]



        ---------
        This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
        To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
        with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
        quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
        [email protected], [email protected], or
        [email protected] (the list administrators).

---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], or
[email protected] (the list administrators).

Reply via email to