Moshe: 1. Yes, a Hazard/Risk analysis IS required by the MD. This must be included in your TCF. The EN standard that defines the format is EN 1050. The EN standards that defines the Risk is pr EN 954-1.
2. Please call Joel Peltier (612 638 0244) or email [email protected] for this answer. I hope this helps. Mark A. D'Agostino 978 739 7016 md'[email protected] http://www.tuvglobal.com ------------- Original Text From: <[email protected]>, on 11/2/98 10:58 PM: Hello Everyone, here are 2 questions: 1. Is Risk/hazard Analysis required as part of formal documentation (TCF?). Which standard defines the format of the analysis? 2. The machine complies with ESD (up to 8KV) immunity, but still I have safety related incidents at customer sites, which are obviously related to ESD (they are simulated at 10KV). What are my options? Should I do nothing? Should I fix the design (up to ?KV)? Should I just document the issue, require antistatic carpets/humidifiers etc from the user? Thanks in advance Moshe -------------------------------------------- Name: moshe valdman E-mail: [email protected] Phone: 972-52-941200 Telefax: 972-3-5496369 List-Post: [email protected] Date: 2/11/98 Time: 19:58:48 You are most welcome to visit my homepage at: http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/5233/ -------------------------------------------- --------- This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected] with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], or [email protected] (the list administrators). --------- This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected] with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], or [email protected] (the list administrators).
