I would like to know if anyone in the group has been involved with the
AGENCY APPROVAL of a product containing a water-cooled live electrode or
coil, and what had to be done to make this safe in the eyes of the agency.
My company is occasionally involved with this sort of thing, and some feel
that we are being overly conservative and perhaps unnecessarily burdening
our products with extra cost.  To date we have only CE-marked such products
and have had no third-party involvement.

Partial list of concerns:

(1) Is it considered necessary to completely isolate the water-cooled live
component from circuitry by locating it in a separate chamber?

(2) Single-fault safety when circuitry is in the same enclosure as the coil
-- if the tube ruptures and the box fills up with water, this is a hazard as
water is rightly considered a conductive element.  Drains are sometimes used
to avoid this, but there is still the problem of water spraying.  Splash
guards and the like may be used but this involves some expense.  Is copper
tubing considered inherently unsafe, i.e. something that is expected to
rupture?

(3) If we use de-ionized water (and stainless steel tubing to avoid the
copper corrosion problem), can we assume the water acts as a protective
impedance?  Could we prove this by filling the chamber with de-ionized
water, applying RF, and measuring the leakage current?  How much RF leakage
current is permissible?

(4) Are water fittings considered inherently unsafe?  We have been unable to
find any agency-approved fittings.

(5) Has anyone considered (or accepted) putting a ferrite around the water
tubing to form an inductor, thus limiting the RF current in the water?  Or
coiling the tubing to create an air-core inductor?

(6) I once received an RF burn from an experimental system with a
water-cooled cathode.  This was in a crude garage shop atmosphere (not our
company).  The cathode was immersed in water that was sourced from a faucet,
so it was ordinary tap water.  The supply was 400kHz, 5kW.  The water supply
hose was ordinary garden hose.  Between the faucet and the cathode were two
lengths of garden hose with brass fittings.  I inadvertently touched the
fitting that connected the two hoses together, about ten feet from the
cathode.  The only grounding at the time was whatever was achieved at the
faucet.  We later provided some grounding at the fittings and supplementary
grounding at the faucet.  All this prompts the question: Is it considered
sufficient protection if the bulkhead fittings are fitted to a grounded
enclosure?  Are starwashers or the like required?

(7) Is it necessary to provide a SUPPLEMENTARY ground for the enclosure
containing the water-cooled coil/electrode?

(8) What if, instead of running water THROUGH the coil, the entire coil is
IMMERSED        in water in a metal enclosure?  Would double ground
connections be sufficient, assuming the leakage current is within allowable
limits?

(9) Is it allowable to connect neoprene hose to the coil?  I have some
doubts about neoprene's capacity to withstand RF fields.  What hose
materials would be considered safe/reliable?

(10) Is a drain required?  If so, must it be large enough to drain the water
at the maximum rate at which it could accumulate, or is the pressure relief
provided by the drain sufficient?  Then there's the question of equipment
orientation . . . must a drain be provided to serve each potential physical
orientation of the installed equipment?

These are just a few of the questions that have come to mind as I've
considered water-cooled systems in the past.  I would appreciate your inputs
on these and other related issues you may think of.

Thanks for your time,

Jeff Jenkins
Senior Regulatory Compliance Engineer
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
Fort Collins, CO USA 80525

Opinions are my own and not necessarily shared by Advanced Energy
Industries, Inc. or its affiliates. 

---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], or
[email protected] (the list administrators).

Reply via email to