On Wed, 23 Jun 1999 11:54:25 +0000, Geoff Lister <[email protected]> wrote:
<snip> >My interpretation of the above, and it is only my opinion - please >feel free to differ, is that for ITE with its related sub-categories, >EN55024 supersedes both EN50082-1 and -2. This would indeed imply a >relaxation on applied limits for these classes of equipment used in >heavy industrial environments. > >Is this what the experts at CENELEC wanted? <snip> What I noticed is that this trades an application-specific requirement (Residential, Commercial, and Light Industry) for a device-specific requirement (ITE equipment). If I was in a factory environment, I would like all the equipment around me to be EMC compatible, without regard as to the device type. It would be sad to read a news story about an accident in a factory due to regulation confusion (the component was tested as an ITE item, but it was controlling an overhead crane). What are the problems or issues addressed by EN55024 that were not covered by EN50082-1? -- Patrick Lawler [email protected] --------- This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected] with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], or [email protected] (the list administrators).
