Pingyu,

I guess GTEM cell is a good choice for your case.
Pls refer to IEC61000-4-3 (for immunity) and 
ANSI C63.4 (for emission), GTEM cell is not only
recognized for pre-compliance test but also
can be used for compliance test as long as 
some correlation can be achieved. 
We did correlation through both modeling, simulation
using FDTD and actual testing to verify the results.
We are using GTEM cell for many different kinds of products
compliance test and PCB trouble-shooting.
It is pretty good. But you have to pay attention
to the uniformity volume of GTEM cell, it's
a bit tricky, especially the cabling of EUT may affect
the result, thus, during the correction, a harness
is supposed to be used to simulate the EUT cabling.

Hope it helps.
Leslie

--- Qu Pingyu <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hello, Everyone:
> 
> I have some questions regarding the GTEM cell. Here
> in our Institute we are
> considering setting up some EMC measurement
> capability for precompliance
> testing. The EUTs we are dealing with are not very
> large, probably not
> larger than a desktop PC. Do you think that GTEM
> cell is a good choice ? Do
> many of you use GTEM as a precompliance testing
> facility ? Your comments are
> highly appreciated.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Qu Pingyu
> 
> 
> ---------
> This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion
> list.
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to
> [email protected]
> with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc"
> (without the
> quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
> [email protected], [email protected], or
> [email protected] (the list
> administrators).
> 
> 
> 

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], or
[email protected] (the list administrators).

Reply via email to