Rich, I'm not aware of differences.
Potential for difference exists during transitions, it takes some time for EN 55022 to follow Amendments to CISPR 22 or new editions. Mirko Matejic > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Cass [SMTP:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, July 08, 1999 2:00 PM > To: '[email protected]' > Subject: RE: CISPR 22 equal to EN55022? > > > Surprisingly, I never got an answer on this. Perhaps many of thought that > it was so simple that someone was bound to answer. > For the exorbitant cost of this service you would think that I would get > better service than this. > ;-) > Rich C. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Cass [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, June 18, 1999 3:55 PM > To: '[email protected]' > Subject: CISPR 22 equal to EN55022? > > > > Neophyte question of the week. > If a supplier of a product claims compliance to CISPR 22, is this exactly > equivalent to EN55022 (assuming you have met all the latest amendments) > for > the purposes of CE marking? > > --------- > This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. > To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected] > with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the > quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected], > [email protected], [email protected], or > [email protected] (the list administrators). > > > --------- > This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. > To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected] > with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the > quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected], > [email protected], [email protected], or > [email protected] (the list administrators). > --------- This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected] with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], or [email protected] (the list administrators).
