Would someone please explain the rationale for IEC 950 requiring basic insulation between earthed secondary hazardous voltage circuits and earthed parts? Since the circuit may be bridged by ordinary electrical components, the need for anything beyond operational insulation appears to be unwarranted. A safety agency is attempting to enforce the exact wording of the standard. Under what conditions could one argue that operational insulation is sufficient, and that a hazard does not exist?
--------- This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected] with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], or [email protected] (the list administrators).
