Don:

One thing that hasn't been mentioned so far is that you should place your
room ground stud as close as possible to the powerline filters. If your room
is a modular design (and not double electrically isolated), then the room is
actually an assembly of conductive panels with clamp plates bridging the gap
between the panels. You should be sure to put the ground stud on the same
panel that carries the powerline filters.

First, for safety, you don't want the capacitive leakage current from the
filters flowing through the mechanical room joints as it heads to the ground
rod.

Second, the filters are removing RF noise currents from the incoming power
lines. These currents are shunted to the case of the filter and flow onto
the conductive surface of the room, following the same path to the ground
rod as the power frequency leakage current. If you allow these RF currents
to flow across the impedance discontinuities of the clamp plates, then there
is the possibility of radiation at those discontinuities. The result is
equivalent to degrading the shielding effectiveness of your room.

You can take some comfort in seeing what my facility looks like. I have a
large and a small modular room. The small room is permanently affixed to the
large room with a 24" x 24" duct (or tunnel) facing into a penetration port
on the side of the large chamber. So, I have two rooms whose outer skin is
electrically common, and provides RF shielding from the outside world. Plus,
the rooms are RF isolated from each other.

The large room has 2 filter lines for DC, 4 filter lines for 60Hz 3 phase,
and 4 filter lines for 400Hz 3 phase. Per the NEC, each three phase AC is a
5 wire Wye configuration, with a safety ground running back to the
distribution panel. The powerline filters are at about eye level on the
outer wall of the room. Immediately below the filters, I drilled two
separate holes in the concrete floor for two ground rods. Each ground rod
has a short 2" wide braid connecting to the ground stud on the room wall.

Now, just to complicate things, my small room also has 60Hz and 400Hz 3
phase power (similar 5 wire Wye feeds). But for these, I was able to
negotiate a compromise with my facilities engineer. The 3 phase lines and
the neutral line for both the 60Hz and 400Hz are wired from the distribution
panel as you would expect. But, the safety ground for both systems loops
down the parent room wall (in conduit) to a disconnect box, and then back up
to the ceiling to rejoin the other wires and proceed to the small room
ground stud. The disconnect box houses a 3 pole double throw switch. In one
position, two of the switch blades separately  bridge the 60Hz and 400Hz
safety grounds, providing a second, fully compliant 5 wire feed for both
60Hz and 400Hz feeds. In the other position, the switch breaks the safety
grounds to the small room filters (and also turns on an embarrassingly
bright red warning light visible to all).

The rationale is that the rooms are one continuous structure, and two safety
grounds are always connected at the large room filters. Plus, there are also
two ground rods attached to the room. I am allowed to disconnect the second
safety ground set only during my physical presence in the lab (the lab is a
locked restricted area) while performing a test. (And yes, as I expected,
the facilities electricians were watching me to make sure I didn't cheat.)

The funny thing is that I don't see the small room ground system causing any
problems, even over the extended military spec frequency range. So I usually
just leave that fancy switch in the closed position, thoroughly violating
single-point grounding.

Finally, as Lou mentioned, you have to be careful of surprise ground paths
on the instrumentation you connect to the room. The coax back to an RF power
amplifier, and then the coax back to a synthesizer, and the coax back to
your oscilloscope might carry a current through to the oscilloscope safety
ground. (I'll salute anybody who has never smoked a scope probe ground
lead!)

This same effect can introduce ambient signals into your emission data if RF
currents flow along your signal coax from the room to the spectrum analyzer.
I always use an isolation transformer with my spectrum analyzer, and I use a
very heavy braided strap to connect the chassis of the spectrum analyzer to
a ground point at the room penetration port.

Regards,

Ed




> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 1999 6:25 AM
> To:   [email protected]
> Subject:      FW: Chamber Grounding
> 
> 
> 
> > Our chamber is grounded/isolated per the instructions of the vendor.  We
> > have one copper clad ground rod installed through a hole drilled in the
> > slab adjacent to the corner of the semi-anechoic chamber.  Other grounds
> > are isolated from the chamber (conduits, air pipes, water pipes, service
> > entrance safety ground, etc.).  The ground comes from the ground rod,
> not
> > the service entrance.
> > 
> > 1)  Is "single-point-ground" as described above for Tempest?  Is the
> > degree of isolation useful for typical commercial work?  The chamber
> spec
> > is 100 dB isolation.  For our immediate work, 60 dB of isolation is
> > adequate.  Is there any correlation between chamber isolation and
> > effectiveness of the ferrites for the uniform field required for
> immunity
> > testing?  Is there some other observable sensitivity such as degraded RF
> > measurements that would result from not observing the isolation?  What
> > would the manifestations be? 
> > 
> > 2)  Using the isolation as described above, has anyone experience ground
> > loop problems between the service entrance power and the local chamber
> > power distribution due to the "single point ground" concept defined
> above?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Don Umbdenstock
> > Sensormatic
> > 
> 
:-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-)
Ed Price
[email protected]
Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab
Cubic Defense Systems
San Diego, CA.  USA
619-505-2780 (Voice)
619-505-1502 (Fax)
Military & Avionics EMC Services Is Our Specialty
Shake-Bake-Shock - Metrology - Reliability Analysis
:-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-)


---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], or
[email protected] (the list administrators).

Reply via email to