Ed,
I put Fluxgate Magnetometer into my search engine, and
it came up with
http://home.t-online.de/home/mayer-dinslaken/flux.htm
http://www.mines.edu/fs_home/tboyd/GP311/MODULES/MAG/NOTES/fluxgate.  
html
http://www.magnetometer.com/

They come with no recommendation, but looked interesting.
Some of the hand compasses with viewfinder sights may have
a suitable resolution but probably lack calibration data.

Long live weird science.
Regards
Geoff

[email protected]
Senior Engineer
Motion Media Technology Ltd., Horton Hall, Horton, Bristol, BS37 6QN, 
UK
Direct: +44 (0) 1454 338561    ISDN: +44 (0) 1454 338554
Switchboard: +44 (0) 1454 313444     Fax: +44 (0) 1454 313678

On Thursday, September 30, 1999 6:50 PM, Price, Ed 
[SMTP:[email protected]] wrote:
>
> Hi Listmembers:
>
> Today's weird science question is about sensing the strength of a
> permanent
> magnetic field.
>
> I need to expose an electronics box to a strong magnetic field (10
> Gauss).
> Then, after removing the field, I need to approach the box with a
> "compass"
> and note the separation distance needed to deflect the compass needle
> a
> couple of degrees. A couple of degrees is pretty hard to read, even 
on
> a
> large compass!
>
> The purpose of the test is to make sure that objects exposed to
> temporary
> magnetic fields do not retain enough field to disrupt a nearby
> magnetic
> compass.
>
> I am trying to determine what kind of sensor I can use. I have been
> looking
> at electronic compass modules. Some models provide a DC analog output
> voltage proportional to angle or heading. Has anyone tried this
> method? Are
> the modules stable enough for this to work? Is there a big problem
> with the
> placement of the data output lines?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ed
>
>
> 
:-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):
> :-):-)
> Ed Price
> [email protected]
> Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab
> Cubic Defense Systems
> San Diego, CA.  USA
> 619-505-2780 (Voice)
> 619-505-1502 (Fax)
> Military & Avionics EMC Services Is Our Specialty
> Shake-Bake-Shock - Metrology - Reliability Analysis
> 
:-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):
> :-):-)
>
>
> ---------
> This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
> with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
> quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
> [email protected], [email protected], or
> [email protected] (the list administrators).

---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], or
[email protected] (the list administrators).

Reply via email to