Hi, That reference is to the old CB Bulletin 89AI, page 117. It has been superseded by CB Bulletin, 94AI, page 108. That deviation has been removed.
Ned Devine Entela, Inc. Program Manager III Phone 616 248 9671 Fax 616 574 9752 e-mail [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: Ehler, Kyle [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, September 10, 1999 11:49 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Insulation resistance I just received an amended CB report for a product we make and I was reviewing it and see that a 'fail' verdict was given for a deviation + test in Sub-Clause 5.3.101 of the Japanese deviation to IEC 950. A remark of "Not evaluated as part of this investigation" also appears. The text of the Deviation + Test reads: "Add: The insulation resistance shall comply with the requirements of Clauses 16.3 of IEC Publication 335-1 (1976) Second Edition." I use UL1950 2nd and 3Rd ed. and I cannot find this 5.3.101 reference in the latest copy of the standard, much less IEC Pub 335-1. If a customer put me on the spot for this, I might need to test for it... Can someone educate me on this? Thank You. Kyle Ehler [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Assistant Design Engineer LSI Logic Corporation --------- This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected] with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], or [email protected] (the list administrators). --------- This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected] with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], or [email protected] (the list administrators).
