Hello from San Diego:


Please respond privately to Steve on this topic.

We all need to protect both ourselves and the IEEE
from possible libel or slander.

If you want to discuss this request, please contact
me privately.


Thanks, and best regards,
Richard Nute
co-administrator, IEEE emc-pstc listserver.



-------------------------------------------------------------
 Richard Nute                      Product Safety Engineer
 Hewlett-Packard Company           Product Regulations Group 
 AiO Division                      Tel   :   +1 858 655 3329 
 16399 West Bernardo Drive         FAX   :   +1 858 655 4979 
 San Diego, California 92127       e-mail:  [email protected] 
-------------------------------------------------------------




>   Dear esteemed colleagues,
>   
>   Our small commercial laboratory lost a modest sized FCC verification test
>   and report to a competitor who DO NOT operate an OATS, but claim the
>   following..........
>   
>   "Our 3m semi-anechoic chamber measuring 18 ft. wide, X 28 ft. long and 28
>   ft. high is FCC certified for testing Class A and Class B digital devices,
>   hence we are in compliance with ANSI C63.4/1992, CISPR 22 publication and
>   FCC Subpart B Class A regulations"
>   
>   If this is in flagrant violation with the FCC rules then I would like to
>   decide on a course of action suitable enough to grab the attention of those
>   who misrepresent our industry.  Does anyone have experience with this same
>   problem or approached A2LA, NVLAP or FCC?
>   
>   Regards,
>   
>   Steve




Reply-To: "Steve Kuiper" <[email protected]>


---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], or
[email protected] (the list administrators).

Reply via email to