I don't see the concern about identifying compliance with the
standard. You analyzed it and discovered that it doesn't apply. By analyzing
the requirement and arriving at a determination that it doesn't apply that
constitutes , in my opinion, complaisance, just as sufficiently as passing
any physical test. Just because you have no additional work or test after
they review of the requirement doesn't mean that the intent of the standard
hasn't been met.
The worse that could happen to you is an audit that would say don't
put it in the document next time, but on the other hand you may not have to
explain to customs agents etc. why it doesn't appear.
Bottom line, I believe you have complied and could list it on the
document, but I've been wrong before
Gary.
Sent: Tto hursday, December 07, 2000 3:32 AM
To: Chris en
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: EN 61000-3-3 listing on a DoC.
Good question................does this also hold true for 61000-3-2 if your
product is under 75 watts?
======================================================================
"Chris Allen" <[email protected]> on 12/07/2000 03:31:14 AM
Please respond to "Chris Allen" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
cc: (bcc: Robert E. Heller/US-Corporate/3M/US)
Subject: EN 61000-3-3 listing on a DoC.
I have a question regarding EN 61000-3-3. The standard states under section
6.1
that "Tests shall not be made on equipment which is unlikely to produce
significant voltage flicker and fluctuations". This is true for the
equipment in
question.
I have been asked by a customer to included the standard on the DoC for the
unit.
My question is:
Is it valid to list a standard on a DoC in the above situation i.e. when
the
product has not been tested against it?
Any guidance would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Chris.
PLANET PROJECT will connect millions of people worldwide through the
combined
technology of 3Com and the Internet. Find out more and register now at
http://www.planetproject.com
-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
[email protected]
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
Michael Garretson: [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected]
-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
[email protected]
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
Michael Garretson: [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected]
-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
[email protected]
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
Michael Garretson: [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected]
