Courtland . . . 

With regards to the fiber optic cable that you make reference to, is that
the 'pigtail' from
the laser device? Or is that the actual installation fiber? 

If the output power is from the far end of an installed fiber, then I would
not 
make that classification. The output power is what is available at the
product itself
without the fiber installed. Someone can turn the unit on without a fiber
installed 
and look into the connector (although one would assume that people would
know better.
But you know where assupmtions get you . . . ).
The other consideration is the location of where the product will ultimately
be installed. Is it 
in a 'restricted access' location? Or is it in an 'unrestricted location'
where any 
idiot can mess with it? That is another variable in determining
classification and what
engineering controls are/are not required.

With specific reference to the label, I would put it near the 'aperture'
from which
the beam is accessible. That makes the most sense. Once again, the CDRH will

check that in the report you file wiht them.
The argument from your marketing dept. has 'some' merit. Personally, I don't
think it's going to affect sales. If your product is 'commercial' equipment
as 
opposed to consumer, then I would like to think (I am assuming again)that
your
customer base is educated about such products. Obviously your customers know
that 
they're buying a laser product? 
The alternative is getting a lawsuit from the customer because there was no
warning
and someone now has retinal damage.Then the CDRH will definitely be reviewng
your file.

John Juhasz
Fiber Options
Bohemia, NY


-----Original Message-----
From: Courtland Thomas [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 2:27 PM
To: emcpost
Subject: Laser Safety Product Labeling



Hello group,

Does anyone have any experience with product labeling equipment, that use
lasers. I have a situation where a Class 3B laser is used, however after the
power attenuation through the fiber cable, the output power is only 800uW
max. This power actually could be considered Class 2, however the wavelength
is 1300nm, which falls into the invisible light spectrum. Therefore, I plan
to label the product Class 3A. If there are any errors in my reasoning,
please let me know. I want to place a caution label (all that is required
for this output level) on the top of the product, but my marketing people
don't want it displayed there because they feel that it may hamper sales.
Unfortunately, marketing has too much authority, so I am looking for a
standard that mandates where the label should go. Everything I have read
only makes suggestions, but I need more than that.

Thanks in advance,

Courtland Thomas
Patton Electronics


-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]

Reply via email to