Hi,
The test level specified in EN55024 is 3 V/m unmodulated, rms (Erms).
You calibrate the forward power in order to get 3 V/m rms unmodulated. 
At this point the peak value of the unmodulated sinusoidal field is Epk = Erms 
=  3 V/m.
When you test, you apply 80% AM to this wave. At this point is the rms value 
still 3 V/m ? (yes according to Ed's answer).
The peak values are changed: AM Epk = (1+0.8) x Epk = 1.8 Epk = 7.6 V/m.
Where Epk is the peak value of unmodulated carrier (= sqrt(2) x Erms = 4.24 
V/m).
AM Epk-pk (peak-to-peak value of 80% AM field) = 2 x sqrt(2) x 1.8 x Erms = 
5.09 x Erms = 15 V/m. The rms value (3 V/m) is most significant, but the peak 
value changes a lot !  

my 2 cents....


Paolo Roncone
Compuprint s.p.a.
Italy

 

-----Messaggio originale-----
Da:     Gary McInturff [SMTP:[email protected]]
Inviato:        mercoledì 6 settembre 2000 23.47
A:      'Bronaugh, Edwin '; ''[email protected]' '
Oggetto:        RE: Immunity Testing to EN55024


 Are you sure you are reading that correctly. In the radiated portion in a
note to the side of the levels it says that the test level is prior to
modulation. I believe that is trying to say turn up the levels until 3 v/m
measured and once that is done then begin the modulation and start sweeping
through the test frequencies.
gary

-----Original Message-----
From: Bronaugh, Edwin
To: '[email protected]'
Sent: 9/6/00 11:31 AM
Subject: RE: Immunity Testing to EN55024


It remains 3 V/m.  However, the peak envelop power is 5.1 dB higher than
the
unmodulated carrier level.  If you set a signal generator to produce an
unmodulated carrier (usually through an amplifier) of 3 V/m and then
modulate it 80 %, the generator will still show the same carrier level,
but
the amplifier will have to produce nearly four times as much power.  If
you
measure the E-Field level with an average (carrier) detector in an EMI
meter, the carrier level will not change from unmodulated to modulated.
If
you use a peak detector, the E-Field level will be 5.1 dB higher.  EdB

-----Original Message-----
From: Antonio Cinquino [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 10:34 AM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: Immunity Testing to EN55024



Hello Group,
 
 
        Table 1 of EN55024 calls for a test specification of 3 V/m
(umodulated, r.m.s) radio-frequecny EM field for Immunity at the
enclosure
port. 
 
        Does anyone know off-hand the value when the signal is 80%
modulated
with an AM signal of 1kHz as called for in the same table?
 

Antonio Cinquino 
CAE Electronics Ltd. 
Electrical System Designer 

Phone : (514) 341-2000 (ext. 4303) 
Fax      : (514) 340-5552 
Email  : [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  

 

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]


-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]


-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]


-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]

Reply via email to