forwarded for Scott.  Jim

____________________Reply Separator____________________
Subject:    RE: Electrical safety of firearms
Author: "Scott Lacey" <[email protected]>
List-Post: [email protected]
Date:       7/27/00 5:02 PM

Phil,
I think you are probably in somewhat new territory here. In the U.S. I am
pretty sure that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (U.S.
Treasury) is the sole regulating authority for firearms. If they don't
a.p.p.r.o.v.e it, you can't sell it - period. Customs authorities in other
markets could probably steer you to the appropriate regulatory bodies.

Now, my personal opinion is that something of this nature needs to be
rigorously tested for immunity. An accidental discharge caused by any
electromagnetic field, permanent magnetic field, or whatever would leave you
wide open to liability lawsuits. I would insist on testing to the maximum limits
for industrial equipment, with no "wiggle room" allowed.

If possible, a mechanical interlock such as a transfer bar should be used so
that the firearm cannot be disharged unless the trigger is deliberately
pressed.

If the goal is simply to reduce the lock time on a firearm used for target
shooting, I think you have a good chance of success. You can design the
system so that failure renders the firing mechanism inoperable.

On the other hand, if this is so-called "smart gun" technology for a handgun
that may be used for personal defense, I think you are in a no-win situation
already. If a malfunction causes an accidental discharge that injures someone,
you are liable. If a malfunction causes a failure to discharge during a
defensive situation, you are also liable. The lawyers win either way. No system
is totally failure proof. I'm betting that companies who attempt this will pay
massive damage awards in the future unless Congress provides some kind of
liability protection.

Food for thought,
Scott Lacey

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf
Of [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 3:51 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Electrical safety of firearms



Here's one that you feel should have something, just because of the nature
of the equipment, but your not quite sure what!!

Does anyone have the least inkling of any safety requirements specific to a
firearm with an electronic trigger. I am not particularly interested in
firearms laws/regulations etc but any requirements that the electronics may
fall under. This device will be powered by a 9-volt battery.

Thanks in advance of any responses.

Phil Godfrey

ps. Domestic, EU, Aus and a few more. Thanks

Phillip Godfrey - Manager, Product Safety
KTL Dallas, Inc.
802, N.Kealy,
Lewisville,
Texas 75057-3136

Tel : (972) 436-9600
Fax: (972) 436-2667
http://www.ktl.com/

email : [email protected]



-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]

Reply via email to