John: CTIA is just a trade association. It looks like they might make it mandatory for their members, but they have no force of law behind them. It seems to me that this is an attempt to assure the public that cellular phones are safe because they comply with FCC limits.
But wait a minute. Isn't CTIA the good folks who convinced our congressmen that America would be a better place if only the reception of a cellular frequency on a general coverage receiver or spectrum analyzer was a felonious action? Drop that mixer and come out with your hands up! Ed :-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-) Ed Price [email protected] Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab Cubic Defense Systems San Diego, CA. USA 858-505-2780 (Voice) 858-505-1583 (Fax) Military & Avionics EMC Services Is Our Specialty Shake-Bake-Shock - Metrology - Reliability Analysis :-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-) > -----Original Message----- > From: Kretsch, John [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2000 6:05 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Cell Phone SAR Requirements > > > > Hey Folks: > > Here's an article about cell phone manufacturers providing > SAR info right on the boxes. > But, what's interesting, they don't have to put the data on > the box, just how to get it from the FCC. > http://news.excite.com/news/ap/000717/18/cell-phone-radiation Regards, John R. Kretsch, P.E., N.C.E. Manager, Design Assurance Engineering ADC Telecommunications Broadband Communications Division ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: [email protected] Michael Garretson: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected]
