Mr. Woods informed me of missing data from my first e-mail - sorry about
that!

Equipment is medical (EN60601-1 Safety, EN60601-1-2 EMI)
Countries: USA, Canada and Europe at this time
There is also an option to use a short range telemetry unit with this device
to transmit patient data. It is spread spectrum at 2.4 GHz. Is an OEM
configuration which we repackage (the transmitter) into the battery back
(+12V) worn my the athlete/patient. It does not have CE, but is complaint
with ETSI 300.28 (I'm not sure what this is it yet)and FCC (which I still
have not seen any FCC cert. yet). Does the telemetry module fall under the
scope of the RTTE directive?   
If I'm missing any other pertinent information please advise.
Thank you

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 9:32 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Telecom Ports


You will have to provide the forum with additional information. 

What kind of equipment? ITE, test equipment, medical, etc.
What countries? Europe, North America, other

Richard Woods

        ----------
        From:  Dick Grobner [SMTP:[email protected]]
        Sent:  Friday, July 14, 2000 10:07 AM
        To:  IEEE EMC-PSTC E-Mail Forum (E-mail)
        Subject:  Telecom Ports


        Good Day Forum Members
        I have a very similar question that Barry Ma presented on 7-13. It
regarded
        a Ethernet port on test equipment. His question was as follows:
         
        1. A phone line port has to comply with related regulations in
Telecom
        world. In my recollection, PC industry just added an Immunity
requirement to
        the phone line port. (It is included in EN55024?) But Ethernet can
be
        converted to phone line through an adapter. Is there a similar
immunity
        requirement for the Ethernet port in test equipment? If not, should
it be
        added to EN61326?

        My dilemma is that my company "inherited" a piece of equipment via
an
        earlier acquisition. On this piece of equipment they incorporated an
RJ-11
        telecom jack. Over this jack they are running power (+12V & pwr gnd)
from a
        remote battery pack and RS-232 (Tx & Rx)comm which terminates to a
PC. Can
        anyone provide me with some insight with regards to EMI/RFI
requirements and
        device safety (I have somewhat of a handle on the safety side - but
welcome
        other opinions!). None of these four lines have any type of safety
(over
        current/voltage) protection nor any EMI filtering, etc. If you can
provide
        some insight or reference to required standards I would appreciate
it!!!!

        Thank You (in advance)
         
        Dick Grobner
        Compliance Engineering
        Medical Graphics Corporation
        350 Oak Grove Parkway
        St Paul, MN 55127
        651-766-3395
        651-484-8941 (fax)
        [email protected]


        -------------------------------------------
        This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
        Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

        To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
             [email protected]
        with the single line:
             unsubscribe emc-pstc

        For help, send mail to the list administrators:
             Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
             Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

        For policy questions, send mail to:
             Richard Nute:           [email protected]
        

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]

Reply via email to