As mentioned previously, 61000-6-2 is an IEC Generic Immunity standard for the
industrial environment. It will eventually become an EN standard superceding EN
50082-2.
============================================================================
---------------------- Forwarded by Robert E. Heller/US-Corporate/3M/US on
09/19/2000 07:48 PM ---------------------------
Robert E. Heller
09/20/2000 07:23 AM
3M Product Safety, St. Paul, MN 55107
76-1-01
EMC Laboratory Fax: 651-778-6252
To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: EN61000-6-2: Voltage dip immunity testing (Document link:
Database 'Robert E. Heller', View '($Sent)')
61000-6-2 is not a normative standard, It is a Generic Standard for the
industrial environment. I do not know of any reason why the two tests at 60% are
required.
==========================================================================
[email protected] on 09/19/2000 04:52:55 PM
Please respond to [email protected]
To: [email protected]
[email protected]
cc: (bcc: Robert E. Heller/US-Corporate/3M/US)
Subject: RE: EN61000-6-2: Voltage dip immunity testing
Requirements are product dependent. Check the governing document, either
generic or product-specific immunity requirements. EN61000-6-2 is a
normative reference, not a governing document, e.g.:
EN50130-4 Immunity requirements for Alarm systems calls out
.5, 1, 5, 10 periods @ 60% reduction and
0.5, 1, and 5 periods @ 100% reduction
David Sterner
Alarm Device Manufacturing Co.
Syosset NY
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 3:05 PM
To: EMC-PSTC
Subject: EN61000-6-2: Voltage dip immunity testing
I was reviewing the voltage dip/interrupt requirements of BS
EN61000-6-2:1999, and noticed that one test condition is a 60% dip for 5
periods (0.1s at 50 Hz), while another is 60% for 50 periods (1s at 50Hz).
Both tests require Performance Criteria C.
- Wouldn't a single test at 50 periods cover this requirement?
- Is there a special operating condition or situation intended for this
test that isn't mentioned in the standard?
-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
[email protected]
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
Michael Garretson: [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected]
-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
[email protected]
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
Michael Garretson: [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected]
-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
[email protected]
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
Michael Garretson: [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected]
