Dear Koh:

My opinion is that first you should distinguish between active components (like 
oscillators, but also EMC sensitive parts like microprocessors, memories, 
ASIC's and all fast logic IC's) and passive components (like ferrites).
For the first type, in any case you cannot be enough confident about the 
goodness of second source components without testing.  My experience tells me 
that even same vendor, "same-all" active components can have significant 
spreads in EMC behavior, because of the parasitic (and often uncontrolled) 
parameters involved. That is especially true for radiated emissions. I remember 
having sometimes nasty surprises when testing products with "identical" 
components that were just from different mfg batches. One typical example is 
the edge rate (rise/fall times) that is usually specified relative to maximum 
values but not at all for minimum values. So even if the edge rates in the data 
sheets are identical, you can get different EMI behaviors (even from the same 
vendor).
As for passive components (like ferrite beads, resistors, capacitors etc. used 
to filter noise at the PCB level) I think you can go with just looking at the 
data sheet, but I would recommend that you test if there is even a small 
difference in impedance curves (that could trigger unexpected resonances or 
change the emissions profile). 
Whenever the purchase dept guys approach me with second (or third) source 
EMI-sensitive components (like those that you mention) I follow these steps:
1. First screening based on data sheet (example impedance curves for ferrites). 
If they at least don't match those of the already qualified/tested components 
they are discarded. If they look the same or even better (example: higher 
impedance for ferrites or higher resonance frequency for capacitors) I go on to 
step 2.
2. Test 

Just my opinion...
Hope this helps.

Paolo

-----Messaggio originale-----
Da:     Koh Nai Ghee [SMTP:[email protected]]
Inviato:        martedì 19 settembre 2000 22.48
A:      EMC-PSTC
Oggetto:        Component Qualification


Group,
Can anyone advice on any guide for checking/qualifying second source
component, such as crystal, oscillator & ferrite bead, mounted on
product is still meeting the emission limits?

We are manufacturer of pheripherals cards. Some card has crystal and/or
oscillator for digital circuitry. Ferrite bead are used too.
As these component will affect the final product EMI level, therefore
some qualification/guide in terms of EMI must be considered when
qualifying second source component.
These components are used in lots of product that we made, it would be
costly to perform scan for every model.
Every product are tested and pass EMI with initial source components.

Can we just made a comparison of the specification of the first source
compnent with this second source?
If yes, what are the crucial specs/information that must meet the first
source component?
For crystal/oscillator, beside the Frequency stability & tolerance
specs, what other item is crucial.
For Ferrite bead, impedance curve, what other item is crucial.

If happens that some specs are slightly out, e.g. 2nd source crystal are
having 5PPM more than initla source crystal,
Can we make use of the product passing margin, say 3dB, and do some
calculation to confidently say that the second source component on the
card is still EMI compliance. Likewise for oscillator and ferrite bead.
If yes, could you advice on an example of such calculation.

Many thanks in advance for the replies.

Regards
Koh


-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]


-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]

Reply via email to