If you are talking about EN 50082-1:1997, then there are no changes. It is
identical to IEC 61000-6-1:1997 (I am assumming that the current prEN 61000-6-1
is the same as the IEC version). I believe that prEN 61000-6-1 is for
standardization with the IEC rather than having a CENELEC only document
(50082-1).

==================================================================================





[email protected] on 09/20/2000 10:10:18 AM

Please respond to [email protected]


To:   [email protected]
cc:    (bcc: Robert E. Heller/US-Corporate/3M/US)
Subject:  prEN61000-6-1




A new generic immunity standard for residential, commercial and light
industrial equipment is in voting stage. DOW is proposed to be 2003-04-01.
You can view the synopsis at:

http://www.cenelec.org/BASIS/celis/free/project/DDW?W%3DPR_LSCCOMM+PH+LIKE+%
2761000%27+ORDER+BY+PR_LSCCOMM/Ascend%26M%3D77%26K%3D8567%26R%3DY%26U%3D1
<http://www.cenelec.org/BASIS/celis/free/project/DDW?W%3DPR_LSCCOMM+PH+LIKE+
%2761000%27+ORDER+BY+PR_LSCCOMM/Ascend%26M%3D77%26K%3D8567%26R%3DY%26U%3D1>

Can someone tell us the significant changes from EN 50082-1?

Richard Woods

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]









-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]

Reply via email to