I am not familiar with those standards. You can obtain English translations of BAPT standards from BSI. The RegTP has issued a notice that the BAPT standards are being converted to RegTP standards. Some have no changes and some are changed. See attached.
<<anlage 5.pdf>>
Good luck.
Richard Woods
----------
From: Wismer, Sam [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 2:05 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: RTTE and Germany
Richard,
Thanks for the input.
As we do with all our radios, we have taken strides prior to
approval to
ensure that our radio met all national deviations so that we could
sell a
single device throughout Europe. We did however have to come up
with a
separate version to take care of Spain and France.
This is why this is somewhat of a surprise to me(Not really).
So I guess my question is, what requirement does the BAPT 222 ZV 126
standard have that is not satisfied by ETS 300 328? Or, is it
technically
equivalent, and they're just being stubborn, in which case all I
need to do
is add this standard to my DoC?
I don't have a copy of the standard, so I am at a loss.
Sam Wismer
RF Approvals Engineer
LXE, Inc.
(770) 447-4224 Ext. 3654
Visit Our Website at:
http://www.lxe.com
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 10:03 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: RTTE and Germany
Sam, you may place RTTE compliant equipment on the market in any
member
state without any changes. However, the equipment may not be placed
in
service in a member state until and unless it complies with any
additional
spectrum, interference and health and safety (EMF) requirements that
a state
may impose according to Article 7(2). You have just discovered that
Germany
has imposed non-harmonized spectrum requirements. My equipment has
similar
problems in Germany, and my equipment cannot be used in Portugal
since the
frequency is allocated to other equipment. You can find a summary of
the
spectrum requirements of the CEPT members in CEPT Recommendation
70-03. The
document can be found at http://www.ero.dk/ <http://www.ero.dk/>
under
"documentation".
Richard Woods
----------
From: Wismer, Sam [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 8:46 AM
To: EMC Forum (E-mail)
Subject: RTTE and Germany
Group,
As required by Article 6.4 of the R&TTE directive I made
notification to
Germany of our intent to place our product on their market.
I
received a
reply advising me that I must re-submit the notification
declaring
compliance to their national standard BAPT 222 ZV 126, in
additon to
the
essential requirements of the R&TTE Directive. It is my
understanding that
requiring me to declare compliance to their national
standard, is in
violation of the of the Directive. I have 2 questions:
1) Is this in violation of the Directive?
2) Is BAPT 222 ZV 126 technically equivalent to ETS 300 328
for
which I
used to declare compliance to the Directive?
Sam Wismer
RF Approvals Engineer
LXE, Inc.
(770) 447-4224 Ext. 3654
Visit Our Website at:
http://www.lxe.com
-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
[email protected]
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
Michael Garretson: [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected]
-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
[email protected]
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
Michael Garretson: [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected]
anlage 5.pdf
Description: Binary data
