Brian,

Most of the information you find will be regarding lifting restrictions for
production workers where to lift heavy objects is part of their everyday
job. The limits are based on weight, size, lift start point, lift
destination point, lift angle, how often,  etc...

I have not found a good source for labeling or warning information for
individual products (as a manufacturer). We make an analyzer which is a
table top (Lab bench) instrument which weighs over 400lbs (180kg). We tossed
around the idea of stating in the installation manual about suggesting 4 men
lift from the corners, but was told that we could become liable if an injury
occurred.

What we ended up doing was to clearly state the weight of the instrument in
the manual and state, "Use proper lifting equipment".  The burden is then on
the customer to find a way to safety lift the unit.

The safety standards (such as EN 61010) states that the product must have a
way of lifting it. So if it is not designed so this can be done you must
provide handles or some way of lifting it either by man or machine.


As far as warning labels go, you only have to use labels if it is not
apparent that the unit is heavy. If it looks heavy it probably is. No
"unknown" hazard there so don't worry about labels. If it is heaver than it
looks, then you would need a label. If it is questionable, use a label. This
is why most packaging (or boxes) have weight warning on boxes that you can't
see what's inside but might be the size some one might try and pick up.

Well anyway, you can't go wrong with the old triangle with the exclamation
point in the center. Under it state the weight or something like ">18kg". I
have seen this method used.  You can get creative and make your own
graphics. UPS uses a picture of a scale with "31.5+" in the middle.  On a
monitor box we have here in the lab there is a graphic of two stick men with
legs bent lifting a box from either side. I have also seen the graphic that
looks like a big weight (like the 1 ton weight that would always fall on the
coyote in the Roadrunner cartoons) with the weight stated in the center.

As a manufacturer you are responsible to do one of two things: eliminate the
hazard (2 levels of protection) or inform of the hazard. If lifting your
product can cause a hazard (or injury) all you can do is inform. In
addition, the safety standards say you have to provide the means to safely
lift. That's basically it.

I'm sorry I could not give you exactly what you asked for.  I asked the same
question last year and spent weeks pouring through factory worker standards
that didn't apply to products. I hope this helps.
Brian Kunde

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf
Of [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 4:11 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Lifting restrictions



Hi group
            Is anyone aware of a standard UL or EN which details the
Weights that are acceptable as one and two person lifts.

I have come across a number of industry and company related
information but cannot find a standard.

Also is there an accepted international  warning label to cover this.

Regards

Brian Harlowe

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]



-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]

Reply via email to